Re: Zarknod's awakening
121. hozzászólás - 2010.09.13. 22:20:24 (Válasz D00ml0rd #120 hozzászólására.)
121. hozzászólás - 2010.09.13. 22:20:24 (Válasz D00ml0rd #120 hozzászólására.)
Your point may be valid, but you picked a poor example to show it. (Or possibly, you just cut off a key bit of information when you copy/pasted)
Idézet: D00ml0rd - 2010.09.13. 21:44:17
According to this description, your spell missed. If that spell hits, you will see some attack penalty applied to your opponent. Since there's no attack penalty, that means that the spell missed, and it's going to do minimal damage, regardless of the absorber. The way I read it, the absorber's effect is pretty straightforward: it subtracts off your opponent's level (or possibly level at the time of acquisition) from the damage of your spell. So if your opponent was level 40, then you would have done 87 points of damage if he hadn't had the absorber.
Idézet: D00ml0rd - 2010.09.13. 21:44:17
magic damage against a player with the absorber
There is quite a distance between you, so you can quickly invoke the burst of light spell. (-100 SP). XXXX tries to evade while running. He takes only 47 damage.
There is quite a distance between you, so you can quickly invoke the burst of light spell. (-100 SP). XXXX tries to evade while running. He takes only 47 damage.
According to this description, your spell missed. If that spell hits, you will see some attack penalty applied to your opponent. Since there's no attack penalty, that means that the spell missed, and it's going to do minimal damage, regardless of the absorber. The way I read it, the absorber's effect is pretty straightforward: it subtracts off your opponent's level (or possibly level at the time of acquisition) from the damage of your spell. So if your opponent was level 40, then you would have done 87 points of damage if he hadn't had the absorber.
Pontszám: 5