Hozzászólások - manunkind

do tell how a literally harmless attack is killing someone.

you can't know that. you make an assumption, again. if i wanted to hit you daily, why hadn't i hit you or anyone else in subplasmas in months? regardless - perhaps you hadn't heard - subplasmas are harmless and legal. my only limitation is that they are a limited resource. this is a pvp game. we are supposed to attack each other.

once. legal. harmless. you have the right to complain, and i have the right to characterize your complaints as whining. you have the right to complain, and i have the right to paint a metaphor of your significance to me: a berry to a bear. if you don't like that, end your public display. if you continue, i have every right to respond.

no one was forced to leave. players upset with legal, harmless attacks quit.

those still complaining after 116 pages are whining, yes.
if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the fire.

for those who feel mocked, my advice is stop exposing yourself in the forum. if you complain publicly, don't be surprised if the people you complain about respond publicly. you have every right to complain (even though admin has given you an answer), and the players you complain about have every right to respond. no one is attacking you in-game and sending you mocking messages. you are making a thing of it.

correct, Doomlord6Laurana. it's a pvp game, and subplasma attacks are harmless.

artemis, i hit you once, literally once a week ago. i hit hades once, literally once the day before. these attacks are legal and harmless. they do not need to be justified or explained. i will employ them as frequently as i want, and i will return when i decide it makes sense for my game. your whining does not make me want to avoid you. good day.

we disagree on its point, but it is allowable to make attacks for any reason.

legal and harmless.

HADES22, four players in my range. how many times per day would you have me hit them?

Nathan, when i typed that it was one. the next day i used several more. legally.

should i not respond? it seems anything i say is considered mockery. i made a legal subplasma attack, and there was instantly a forum complaint. as was discussed, this event changes my needs, and i use subplasmas. good day and buckle up.

yes, i used a subplasma. the sky is falling!

legal and harmless, that should end the debate.

deadlock, they have the right to complain. there is no rule against it. but those complaints are without merit.

my apologies, Urul, if i missed your message. i said berries because i meant berries. i had been accused of targeting low-level players, and i was making the point that i'd rather have a full meal. but when that is unavailable, a berry will suffice.

hypocrisy would be asking others to do it while i refuse. if the rules change, we will all do it. until then, i won't limit myself. these attacks are harmless, yet you've complained for more than a hundred pages. that's obsession.

i suggested Beholder create limits, but they did not implement my suggestion. so i will continue to utilize my full range of options.
players are complaining months and even years after i last subplasma attacked them. i am short on sympathy for what was a harmless encounter.
if you want to talk about pointless, take a look at these complaints.

i have not used a single subplasma since january. it is april. if you are seeking someone obsessing over them, look at the endless complaints.

if the rules for subplasmas are changed, i will follow the new rules. if the rules for subplasmas are not changed, i will continue to use them as i see fit.