Hozzászólások - manunkind

i haven't used a single subplasma in months. i've never asked anyone to attack on my behalf. get over yourselves. at some point, i will use subplasmas again - likely during RotP. when i do, it will be legal and harmless. stop with the victim mentality, and make yourself into something.

i have answered you about why i use subplasmas over and over. scroll back. i am done. i don't need a reason.
what good would it do me to have you believe i had stopped attacking while i was still attacking or while someone else attacked on my behalf?
i can attack you legally myself as much as i please. i don't need your approval. i don't need to lie.
the lesson, here, is i'd be better off not engaging at all.

ok, i have to ask. what would be my motive to lie about any of this? you are not accusing me of breaking the rules. i can admit to attacking you without fear of punishment. so what would i gain by being dishonest?

signe, i'm glad we are both concerned with accuracy.

correct, i have nothing to do with it. i'm glad we finally worked this out.

Subzero77, i have sent no one, ever. the absurdity that the most powerful player in the game does my bidding is hilarious. you guys are disconnected from reality.

signe, i would say maybe i missed it, but then i wouldn't have completed my task, so i'm gonna stick with my answer. we'll have to agree to disagree on the numbers. what we should be able to agree on is that regardless of the number, it was legal and harmless and months ago.

i look forward to april when we can all begin arguing about something new - how many times you got legally and harmlessly hit during RotP.

you must've missed one. it was four.

enzio, your hearsay is incorrect. show reports. no one was hit by my subplasma attacks in january 3 times or 5 times. all 5 targets were hit exactly 4 times. no numbers matter though because any number is legal.

signe, > means greater than, = means equal to. you wrote >4 which contradicts what enzio himself said =4.

yes, if i realized you had gotten premium to block my attacks, i could pretend that i stopped of my own volition. but i did not know because i had already stopped.
what in any of this is against the rules?

signe said ">4 to enzio" above.
(this is precisely my point in asking for direct evidence instead of memory. one of you or signe is necessarily wrong.)
you said 4, and i said great we agree. why are you still arguing?

cassandra, i sent no one.

then we agree that it was 4 consecutive days in january and none since. great.
if you blocked my attacks, then you have no way of knowing if i stopped or was stopped.
therefore, it is an assumption to say that i would have continued, an incorrect one at that.
if you bought premium just to stop me, you wasted your money. i stopped when i completed my task (5x4=20).
all entirely legal.
RotP is coming, my little berries.

signe, if your computer has copy/paste, you can record battles. the game itself has a notes feature. if you care enough to complain, you should care enough to gather evidence.
if i recall, enzio posted 2 or 3 reports. i hit him 4 times in january. if he thinks i hit him 5 times, he will need to post 5 reports to convince me in am in error.
but whether it's 3, 4, 5 or 8072 doesn't matter because i can use as many subplasmas as i wish.

enzio, i sent no one. which part of that do you not understand? anyone can subplasma attack you as they wish.

given how impactful my harmless attacks are, surely you'll retain the battle reports moving forward. that way, you will have evidence to show when and how often i use this perfectly legal resource.

i'm not asking for your recollection. i'm asking for battle reports if you wish to disprove me. i know what i did and didn't do. you can be wrong without intentionally lying.

it doesn't matter because the frequency and timing of my subplasma attacks are ALL within the rules.

signe, if you're saying i hit you 4 times in january, that may be true. if you are saying more times or more recently, then you are wrong. your memory is imperfect. show me the reports that contradict what i'm saying.

none of what you're arguing about matters.

then enzio's premium prevented exactly zero new attacks from me because once i got in my 5x4=20 for the task, i stopped. he should've asked my intention before pulling the trigger.

i have made exactly zero subplasma attacks since catwoman's post.

but at some point, i will make more because i am free to use my in-game resources as i see fit.

surely you all can't really be this dense. whether it's 4 attacks or 4000, it's legal. your complaint isn't with me. it's with the rules. and you have gotten your answer from admin on the rules. subplasmas will remain legal. because they are literally harmless.

if you wish to quit over harmless attacks, you may. personally, i would ignore them - something you can do because they're harmless. apparently, if you wish to complain indefinitely over harmless attacks, that is allowed too. and in my opinion, that does more harm to the game than subplasma attacks themselves.

gerald, i have probably subplasma attacked everyone here who claims it at some point. but i have not attacked them as recently nor as frequently as most are claiming. if enzio says 5 times in january, he is wrong. it was 4. if enzio says i attacked him in february, he is wrong. it was january. but. it. doesn't. matter. it's. allowed. regardless.

and i have agreed that i hit you four times in january and none since. legal regardless.