Hozzászólások - manunkind

i have never suggested anyone should thank me for my attacks.
i have never lied to you, not even once.
you just don't like the answers you're getting.

when you continue to complain about something after you've gotten an explanation and an answer from admin, yeah, that's whining.
subplasmas are legal to use against any level at any frequency for any reason. they are harmless.
complaining interminably doesn't change any of this.

as you finally seem to be accepting the truth that i have not used any subplasmas since the 20 i used in january, you have moved the goal posts and now want to blame me for others using subplasmas.

i have never asked anyone to attack on my behalf.

you have drawn an incorrect conclusion. i have never asked anyone to attack on my behalf. perhaps they just find your whiny posts annoying.

do you really expect a different answer to the same complaint? it's still harmless, and it's still legal, so your complaint still has no merit.

having used none since january, i did not drive those players from the game in april.

no harm, no rule broken, and a resource being used for its intended purpose. i'd shrug it off.

what could i possibly say, maxhths, that you would not interpret as mocking?
nhsos, don't my "daily" attacks ruin the surprise?
baboons, three stooges... are you guys like nine years old?

may their memory be a blessing.

you guys sure post a lot for having quit.

i haven't used a single subplasma in months. i've never asked anyone to attack on my behalf. get over yourselves. at some point, i will use subplasmas again - likely during RotP. when i do, it will be legal and harmless. stop with the victim mentality, and make yourself into something.

i have answered you about why i use subplasmas over and over. scroll back. i am done. i don't need a reason.
what good would it do me to have you believe i had stopped attacking while i was still attacking or while someone else attacked on my behalf?
i can attack you legally myself as much as i please. i don't need your approval. i don't need to lie.
the lesson, here, is i'd be better off not engaging at all.

ok, i have to ask. what would be my motive to lie about any of this? you are not accusing me of breaking the rules. i can admit to attacking you without fear of punishment. so what would i gain by being dishonest?

signe, i'm glad we are both concerned with accuracy.

correct, i have nothing to do with it. i'm glad we finally worked this out.

Subzero77, i have sent no one, ever. the absurdity that the most powerful player in the game does my bidding is hilarious. you guys are disconnected from reality.

signe, i would say maybe i missed it, but then i wouldn't have completed my task, so i'm gonna stick with my answer. we'll have to agree to disagree on the numbers. what we should be able to agree on is that regardless of the number, it was legal and harmless and months ago.

i look forward to april when we can all begin arguing about something new - how many times you got legally and harmlessly hit during RotP.

you must've missed one. it was four.

enzio, your hearsay is incorrect. show reports. no one was hit by my subplasma attacks in january 3 times or 5 times. all 5 targets were hit exactly 4 times. no numbers matter though because any number is legal.

signe, > means greater than, = means equal to. you wrote >4 which contradicts what enzio himself said =4.

yes, if i realized you had gotten premium to block my attacks, i could pretend that i stopped of my own volition. but i did not know because i had already stopped.
what in any of this is against the rules?

signe said ">4 to enzio" above.
(this is precisely my point in asking for direct evidence instead of memory. one of you or signe is necessarily wrong.)
you said 4, and i said great we agree. why are you still arguing?

cassandra, i sent no one.