Hozzászólások - manunkind

signe, if your computer has copy/paste, you can record battles. the game itself has a notes feature. if you care enough to complain, you should care enough to gather evidence.
if i recall, enzio posted 2 or 3 reports. i hit him 4 times in january. if he thinks i hit him 5 times, he will need to post 5 reports to convince me in am in error.
but whether it's 3, 4, 5 or 8072 doesn't matter because i can use as many subplasmas as i wish.

enzio, i sent no one. which part of that do you not understand? anyone can subplasma attack you as they wish.

given how impactful my harmless attacks are, surely you'll retain the battle reports moving forward. that way, you will have evidence to show when and how often i use this perfectly legal resource.

i'm not asking for your recollection. i'm asking for battle reports if you wish to disprove me. i know what i did and didn't do. you can be wrong without intentionally lying.

it doesn't matter because the frequency and timing of my subplasma attacks are ALL within the rules.

signe, if you're saying i hit you 4 times in january, that may be true. if you are saying more times or more recently, then you are wrong. your memory is imperfect. show me the reports that contradict what i'm saying.

none of what you're arguing about matters.

then enzio's premium prevented exactly zero new attacks from me because once i got in my 5x4=20 for the task, i stopped. he should've asked my intention before pulling the trigger.

i have made exactly zero subplasma attacks since catwoman's post.

but at some point, i will make more because i am free to use my in-game resources as i see fit.

surely you all can't really be this dense. whether it's 4 attacks or 4000, it's legal. your complaint isn't with me. it's with the rules. and you have gotten your answer from admin on the rules. subplasmas will remain legal. because they are literally harmless.

if you wish to quit over harmless attacks, you may. personally, i would ignore them - something you can do because they're harmless. apparently, if you wish to complain indefinitely over harmless attacks, that is allowed too. and in my opinion, that does more harm to the game than subplasma attacks themselves.

gerald, i have probably subplasma attacked everyone here who claims it at some point. but i have not attacked them as recently nor as frequently as most are claiming. if enzio says 5 times in january, he is wrong. it was 4. if enzio says i attacked him in february, he is wrong. it was january. but. it. doesn't. matter. it's. allowed. regardless.

and i have agreed that i hit you four times in january and none since. legal regardless.

the frequency and timing of my subplasma attacks have been regularly misrepresented. i have not assumed that misrepresentation was intentional. my attacks must've left quite an impression. therefore, i have refrained from accusing anyone here of lying even when i know they've been wrong.

we can keep doing this - going on wild goose chases, around in circles, and moving the goal posts - but none of it matters. all of my subplasma attacks have been perfectly legal, and none of them have caused any harm. all your complaints accomplish is making you look like a sore loser. if that is your goal, then congrats, mission accomplished.

for the record, i never told you to be thankful - that was admin's suggestion - and i don't believe i have ever called any of you a liar. i have said repeatedly that you are wrong, however. lying means you are intentionally saying something that isn't true. all still moot since you have no claim of rulebreaking or even harm. you have no argument, just endless complaints.

"for any reason."

"for any reason."

i have explained my reasons ad nauseum even though i didn't have to. you have rejected those explanations, hence i am done.

come up with a new complaint if you want a new answer.
subplasmas are legal against any level at any frequency for any reason.

legal. harmless. </end>

the ongoing personal insults do a fantastic job making your case that i'm the villain.

you don't say? well, this is the first i've heard.

this forum is a case study in logical fallacies.

you have no idea, and i've grown bored.

i love a good argument. this is not one.

let me be as explicit as possible, kids. if you wish to lodge a successful complaint, you need to justify your complaint. if you're complaining about something that breaks no rule and causes no harm, your complaint has no merit.