first of all,why should enzio should believe you(although this is something that enzio should ask you)?for 4 days as you admitted you were hitting him daily.seeing enzio lvl i dont think that he or any of his clan even provoke you or your clan.but anyway this is not only enzio.go back on the commnets and see how many have problem wi th your constant attacks and all were below lvl 50.so you do understand that even if what you say was true noone can believe you.
regarding the complain?well if you see it is on both althoug is i remeber correct when it was suggested to be a lomit on how low you can hit with subplasma you were the fist,if not the only one,that opposeed to this.even with the subplasma as it is there is no point of targeting players below lv 50(actually there is no reason to hit players with more than 50 lvl difference for complating your task but i am sure oyu are avoiding even this).so as you might understand the porblem is with both of you,especially for the below lvl50.but honestly manukind when you atatck someone that is lvl 20 or 25 do you think that he must feel gratefull or thankfull to you?
" does more harm to the game than subplasma attacks themselves" actually as have been proven this is not apply.and this you can see it on how many new players have left after the constand hits of lvl200 plus to players lvl50 and less.actuallly how some players choose to use them(personally i prefer to say abuse them,but we agree on disagree on that) on tergeting new players is oen of the reaons that new players are leaving,the game has the lowest and the most brutal comments on gamers corner.when the lesser scarab added(somrthing you were always opposing also) things loos better we were calling ald player thta left and new players to come back and then something started all over again for no reason(you dont gain anything) so players stast leaving againa dn the comments about the game is even more brutal than before.but anyway those dont concern you as long as you ccan hit low and new players,right?

"have refrained from accusing anyone here of lying even when i know they've been wrong."how am i wrong in knowing that you hit mamanukind?pls do explain to me how am i wrong on thta you hit me the moment i had the battle reports?you do know thta in the battle notification on the battle report the name of the attacker appear right?so how i have confused you with another?

none of what you're arguing about matters.

signe, if you're saying i hit you 4 times in january, that may be true. if you are saying more times or more recently, then you are wrong. your memory is imperfect. show me the reports that contradict what i'm saying.

first of all if you have even read my messages you would have seen that i told you exactly how many times you hit me and my clansmates that left the game and already deleted their accounts.so let me refresh your memory >4 to enzio.5 to eivor,3 to alexios that left ,3 to black widow that left also,3 to me(now those are 18 attacks on my cln only i can assume that you did more to other so propably more than the only 20 totally that you are saying you did in january).my memory is perfect especially on your hits to me,maybe your memory has a problem.and i never said that you hit me afyer january but you ave hit me plentyy of times before january.you actually start hitting me if i rememer correct when i was lvl27(could be wrong on that though but for sure before i reach lvl 30).
"none of what you're arguing about matters." when you call me a liar it does matter.

let me add that it jus happened that your higher lvls started the subplasma attacks when signe disagree with you in the forum.attacks that you dont gain anything.i know,manukind, you have nothing to do with that as always.i am not planning to debate.either way i wouldnt have come to the forum unless i had the task.

i'm not asking for your recollection. i'm asking for battle reports if you wish to disprove me. i know what i did and didn't do. you can be wrong without intentionally lying.

it doesn't matter because the frequency and timing of my subplasma attacks are ALL within the rules.

first of all you know that battle reports have a limited number and after gets deleted(i dont know how much exactly but i am sure you know that and we dont have to debate for that too).secondly when i say tha you hit me(and i know that you hit and you know it too)how could i be wrong?pls do expain that to me

given how impactful my harmless attacks are, surely you'll retain the battle reports moving forward. that way, you will have evidence to show when and how often i use this perfectly legal resource.

you do know that you cannot archive the battle reports unless you are premium,right?.and i didnt know that i have to make a word archive specially for your attacks(you think too much of yourself).i will remind you that enzio that actually gave you date and times and you still say he might be wrong.you try so much to convince the ones that you have hit that you didnt hit them which it is getting ridiculus after one point

onlythe fact that you have send your frineds to hit again whoever they could with subplasma attacks only shows not only your hypocrisy manukind but also wheneve someone dont agree with you send your friends after them.so do stop pretending to be the "civiliazed".

signe, if your computer has copy/paste, you can record battles. the game itself has a notes feature. if you care enough to complain, you should care enough to gather evidence.
if i recall, enzio posted 2 or 3 reports. i hit him 4 times in january. if he thinks i hit him 5 times, he will need to post 5 reports to convince me in am in error.
but whether it's 3, 4, 5 or 8072 doesn't matter because i can use as many subplasmas as i wish.

enzio, i sent no one. which part of that do you not understand? anyone can subplasma attack you as they wish.

manukind either you dont know how to read or you do it purpose to piss players.there is no other explanation.
1.i have said that you hit for 4 continuing days(and i have porved that)
2.signe told the exact smae thing.just read her comment before you answer.seriously signe was crystal clear.it is impossible not to understand it!
3.so if it was 5 times it would be bad,now thta are 4(before i blocked your attacks) it is ok?
4.come on manukind.let me guess.again it is just a coincidence that the whole clan even the ones that havent posted here have been been attacked by subplasma from your clan?i do a see a patter here.....or you gonna deny that too?

then we agree that it was 4 consecutive days in january and none since. great.
if you blocked my attacks, then you have no way of knowing if i stopped or was stopped.
therefore, it is an assumption to say that i would have continued, an incorrect one at that.
if you bought premium just to stop me, you wasted your money. i stopped when i completed my task (5x4=20).
all entirely legal.
RotP is coming, my little berries.

you stopped and you start sending you buddies cause you are a "civilized" player right? as for the PoR lets see how many berries you will find to ruin their game(somehing that yo enjoy so stop pretending the opposite).but hey no problem you are a "civilized"player that dont use subplasma.that dont hit players that are no less than 200 lvl below him and dont send his buddies to do what he dont do because he has to appear himself as civilized.right?

and by the way i am lvl27(very hard to beat me right?) dont forget to put all your effort do beat me and ofcourse tell to your friends to do it

cassandra, i sent no one.

manukind i never said it was 5.just because you hav problem to understand dont try to make me a liar.i was very clear,when signe mentined it she was very clear.you seem to have problem ti understand it.and we are nto making a deal,those 4 attacks were made.
"if you blocked my attacks, then you have no way of knowing if i stopped or was stopped" and yu also have no way to convince me for the opposite.even if you were attacking for 1 month and then blocked your attacks you could have ssaid the same right?
"RotP is coming, my little berries."again with the threats?

signe said ">4 to enzio" above.
(this is precisely my point in asking for direct evidence instead of memory. one of you or signe is necessarily wrong.)
you said 4, and i said great we agree. why are you still arguing?

yes, if i realized you had gotten premium to block my attacks, i could pretend that i stopped of my own volition. but i did not know because i had already stopped.
what in any of this is against the rules?