Hozzászólások - manunkind

the question remains: why do you have such a problem with subplasmas? so what if attacks are from a player much higher level? these attacks are harmless. if i were closer level, i would attack you without subplasmas and get your SE. i would love that.

but my motives are a red herring. it doesn't matter why i use subplasmas. there are no limitations. i am allowed to use them for any reason.

aside from my mistaken attack of enzio, i do not attack players who have the scarab.

no, you did not answer, neo2022. you don't like getting attacked by a player of much higher level, but why? what's the big deal? why publicly complain when it causes no harm?

i will tell you what i think. i think you know you have no good answer. i think you're upset even though it's harmless, and you came here to complain. but because it's harmless, you can't articulate any harm. but you're mad, so you're carrying on anyway.

neo2022, when you say "i wouldnt have a problem if we were on the normal range and you were attacking me every day," you are still not saying what the problem is. what is the problem being attacked from outside your normal range with subplasmas?

gerald, if you don't believe me, then why do you care if i answer? why do you care about attacks that are harmless?

in exchange for allowing us to attack out of our normal range subplasmas are harmless. given this, why is it a problem?

neo2022, i'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and try answering yet AGAIN, but to be clear, i can attack you with subplasmas for any reason. i generally do not attack with subplasmas because they are not worth it. i have more than 7000 available. sometimes a task compels me to attack with subplasmas. on those occasions, i target active players to drag into my torture chamber. i start at my level and work my way down. there are few targets available (horde, catacombs, scarabs, etc.), so i end up attacking low level players. these attacks are harmless.

you are complaining and you can't explain why you are complaining. i am not complaining. the onus is on you. i don't need to justify why i attack you. any reason is legal, and you don't believe my answers anyway. so try again: finish the sentence: despite being harmless, the problem with subplasma attacks is...

the closest to a substantive answer i have seen is when neo2022 said subplasma attacks hurt his "nerves." the implicit answer from you all seems to be that you simply don't like getting attacked by a more powerful opponent. but this is a pvp game - what did you expect? subplasmas allow attacks with a large level difference - that is what they are for - and that is why they cause no actual harm. given this, what is your complaint? what is your objective here? why are you playing a pvp game and then complaining about getting attacked (even when you lose nothing)?

if you start leveling up, we can battle for real. now that would be fun.

finish the sentence if you can: despite being harmless, the problem with subplasma attacks is...

catwoman, not once. please, tell me simply for my simple mind. what is the big deal with harmless attacks?

thor77, i am not the one with the complaint. what is it about harmless attacks that is so problematic? saying that i am the problem doesn't explain WHY it's a problem. you could simply ignore them, yet here you are in the complaints forum. again.

thor77, you did not answer the question. since subplasma attacks are harmless, what exactly is your complaint?

ultimately, my motive is irrelevant, as is whether you believe i'm being honest about my motive. i can attack you for my torture chamber, for SE, for a task, for a quest, mistakenly, or merely out of spite - it's all legal. the question is why such a harmless attack bothers you so much.

i'm not asking the reason. the reason is moot since subplasma attacks are legal. they do not need to be justified. i'm asked the problem. since subplasma attacks are harmless, what exactly is your complaint?

ad nauseum. given that subplasmas are legal and harmless, what is your complaint?

enzio, fine, it's pedantic, but if you must have a number, my answer is 4. daily means at least 4 days. after 4 days, you can rationally hypothesize that it would continue, but you might be wrong. in the case of me attacking you in january, you would have been wrong since we know it ended after 4 days. that's why it's unwise to assume. and that's why hypothesize and assume are two different things.

when i attacked you in january, i only checked for your scarab the first time. then i attacked those same 5 targets for 4 days. i wasn't watching all that closely because subplasmas are harmless. so i ask yet again, given that subplasmas are legal and harmless, what is your complaint?

enzio, i have answered ad nauseum. there are no torture chamber gains for attacking you, just the same gains as attacking an inactive player. i made a mistake. if i attack you in the future, it will be on purpose.

catwoman "daily" suggests ongoing. we can debate how many is "ongoing, " but two is not ongoing. it would have to be more than a few. when you assume it will continue, and go premium to stop it, you cannot rationally claim that it would have continued based on your sample size of two.

but these are semantics. here is what matters: subplasmas are legal and harmless. given this, what is your complaint?

i've answered every question you've asked honestly, thoroughly, and repeatedly. my goodwill is waning. subplasmas are legal and harmless. your ongoing complaints are pointless.

we continue to bicker over nonsense. you listen only to respond. these are the simple facts to which you have no answer: subplasmas are legal and harmless.

catwoman, you are lost.