Hozzászólások - manunkind

wow, you guys really don't want to win. if my normal range is, say, +/-20 and i'm level 250, then with my proposal, a subplasma would allow me to make an attack at a range of +/-40. subplasmas would no longer allow attacks without regard to level. this would most certainly prevent attacks of 100 level differences. fun fact: 100 > 40. but you go right on arguing about it. smh.

mrgreen, joker22, right now subplasmas allow you to attack anyone in the game (clan/horde limitations notwithstanding) regardless of level. i'm not suggesting increasing the normal attack range. i'm suggesting nerfing subplasmas so they would allow you to double what would normally be your attack range. this would both increase available targets from no subplasmas and prevent attacks of very high to very low (and vice versa). this nerf does not benefit me personally.

zeus76, doubling normal range would PREVENT attacking much lower targets. increasing cost would just deter (and poorly at that).

spidy, if you win the scarab of death, you can't be dragged into the torture chamber with subplasmas.

deadpool21, it's a pvp game. we are supposed to attack each other. your definition of "all the time" is different than mine. i would not characterize twice four months ago as "all the time." are others hitting you?

again, i am not opposed to making subplasma changes. i just think there's a simpler solution: ignore them, as they do not impede your progress. fwiw, i currently have 6303 subplasmas. as i keep telling you and your clanmates, subplasma attacks have never been a regular part of my strategy. multiplying the cost would not be an effective deterrent.

OR you could simply ignore it because it steals NO SE. you guys keep making this assumption that you need to prevent subplasma attacks. you don't.

(i do not recall a suggestion of additional subplasmas required to hit certain players. i don't much care either way. i'll play within whatever rules we have.)

question still a problem.

"Who is generally regarded as the founder of quantum mechanics?"

i'm not sure there's general consensus on who deserves this title.
a case can be made for many besides heisenberg.

solution: remove question.

https://www.qmunity.tech/post/max-planck-the-father-of-quantum-mechanics
https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/The_Quantum_age_begins/
https://www.quora.com/Who-is-considered-the-father-of-quantum-mechanics

i'm not aware of any high-level players demanding subplasmas. it's true that limited targets is a problem. i've personally made several suggestions about limiting subplasmas (e.g., doubling normal range) and about removing subplasma tasks (through the in-game help button where we're more likely to get a response). if i could convert my subplasmas to other useful resource(s), i'd have no problem with their removal from the game. there won't be any "riots."

that said, the complaints about how the constant subplasma attacks are ruining the game are silly. all you have to do is ignore them - problem solved. and coming on the forum saying you had to purchase premium because of subplasma attacks sounds to me like an argument to Beholder for keeping them.

Dionysos, perhaps you missed it previously, but subplasma attacks take no SE. your player is not killed. good luck though. it must be hard recovering from those two attacks in january. but i believe in you.

we agree on one thing, though. you are 'weaker, smaller, and in some way vulnerable.'

and just because i hit you (twice) doesn't mean i don't also hit more competitive players at higher levels. your POV is narrow. i am reminded why i had stopped engaging.

although it's hard not to pick this apart: "habitually cruel, insulting, or threatening"

habitually: twice in january.
cruel: subplasma attack causes no harm.
insulting: i have called you no names. you, on the other hand, can't say the same.
threatening: i have neither threatened nor retaliated against your 10 pages of complaints against me.

Dionysos, here's one more for you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_versus_player

it's hard to find targets during war of the hucksters. i should probably give you a closer look again.

...twice back in january and you're still complaining about it. wow.

Dionysos, if you're unfamiliar with the term 'external locus of control,' i think you'd benefit from reading about it.

there are a multitude of good sources, but here's a link to get you started: https://www.simplypsychology.org/locus-of-control.html

good luck!

Dionysos, you might be better served by focusing your energy on a path toward your own success than on wild, indefensible, public accusations of others. perhaps you mistakenly scried the wrong account. that's really embarrassing for you.

DoomlordFos, it's been a while (years) since Beholder removed the ability to exchange BOAS for platinum. we can still use them for the mytokronit extractor though.

valorian, Beholder gifted us 200 AS. that's a 190 profit.

ernie007, spend some on the daily offer.

pyro666, i explained some of the numbers a week ago. we're going in circles. this is pointless.

pyro666, extrapolating that i would keep attacking is incorrect. needing to stop my attacks is a false assumption (as they cause no harm). i did not say you said i was mad at your clanmate. you suggested there may be a personal motive like that, and i was confirming that there wasn't. while i think you are wrong about the frequency of my attacks, i have gone to lengths to say that i do not believe you are lying. i think my attacks left an outsized impression. as for events, there are many, and some are not on the same schedule (like The Search and Gods of Ghalla). so you may have not been in an event/task while i was.