Idézet: MartinBV - 2010.07.05. 19:08:56 I didn't know this either, (wikipedia is a nice thing) so I agree that changing the question as suggested is a good idea.
I don't get what the difference is between a factual question about the numerical rules of a game/sport and a question about the relative numerical heights of the "tallest" or "smallest". It's not like a date where an educated guess is a good route... With the rules of a game or sport you either know it or don't know it - so a greater range shouldn't help anything except to dummify the quiz (why have four answers when some of them are
obviously wrong).
I didn't know this either, (wikipedia is a nice thing) so I agree that changing the question as suggested is a good idea.
If the answers were 1, 3, 6, 10 - would you not have had to look it up? Or do you want possibilities of 1, 3, 10, 30? If you don't know, you either guess blind or look it up - I just don't see how a range matters in a case like this. Dates, yes. But not stuff like this.