Idézet: Dakaan - 2010.05.09. 18:45:19 I have to disagree with both of you. You see it from your point of view but if a warrior clan attacks a builder clan, then it's not fun for anyone. That will cut out strategy from the game, because catacombs cant be used for two weeks after you used them, and invisibility cant provide safe passage for a full builder.
So no i don't agree with taking one of the temporary defense.
"If the big hitters stay, the war is won anyway." - not necessary. And i'll leave you to figure out why.
Like in real life sometimes you need to take out weaker members to be able to go on ... so letting out weaker members is a valid strategy, this is my point of view.
You mentioned catacombs, but what if i can use catacombs as a passive weapon in a war, would you ask them to take it out? (again i will let you to figure out how i can do that).
Listen, you can't be a pure builder or warrior clan. That is basically a recipe to guaranteed doom.
Let's look at it from RL situations to explain better.
An empire made up from just farmers is not capable to defend itself from a group of bandits, whilst an empire made solely of warriors won't be able to eat anything; in both aspects the result is death or something very similar.
In short, if you expect to go anywhere you need balance. And that's absolute.
Now, if your clan is either pure builders/warrior then it's pretty much your "own"(clan) fault.
If you are in a mixed clan, and you are loosing; well it ain't nobody's fault if you are weak, is it?
This is harsh, but it's reality