Idézet: Viridel - 2010.03.15. 02:14:39 Idézet: Twinky - 2010.03.14. 22:43:15 I really wish that either ONE Evaluator did the evaluating or they all got together and set a solid decisive set of rules on what is and is not an acceptable question, because I just got this
How many movies, worldwide, have been made based on the Holy Bible?
162
287
45
1875
The question is valued as "Bad, incorrect question"!
According to evaluators only a special group of people might know the answer.
From them, when I just resubmited it, since the first time it was submited it was rejected due to a spelling error, which indicates that it was an acceptable question to the person who looked at it that time.
Expecially when the question "In the Bible, who killed Abel" was considered an acceptable question, one which I have answered several times.
To me it seems like the evaluators are just not all together on what they find acceptable, considering my question has a much broader source (Movies based on the Bible), where as the accepted question has a much more limited source (A single section of the bible).
No, this is just a bad question. If I shoot a movie in my basement, does that count? What if I make a DVD of it and give it to a video store? And how do you define "based on the bible"? Any film where a character goes "God damn it!" or "Jesus Christ!" has a biblical element. Beyond that - worldwide? You know what's going on in some film studio in Nowhereville, North Korea? Lastly, this non-confirmable number is constantly changing, meaning the question is possibly obsolete the day it's approved.
And very lastly - in an international game, let's keep religion out of it completely - things are always more harmonious with less religion involved, not more.
My irritation isn't so much at the fact that it was rejected, but that the question that gave me the idea for that question, was approved and it is much more specific yet mine is considered something that only a "Special Group of people would know the answer".
I'm only really irritaded that they're not being consistant on what is and is not allowed as a question. Hell I know it's specific knowledge, I had to fuckin look it up myself.