in your avalanche of subplasma complaints, i ask you all yet again: what rule was broken? what harm was caused? hint: it's the same answer to both.

since you failing and avoiding the same question,let me ask you one more time.since you dont gain anything from those attacks,why you keep doing them?it is not the 10SE,which as you said before desperately needed before from the torture chamber.you cannot drag them to oyur torture.so what is the reason of your daily attacks or even the 1 or 3 or 4 attacks on an active player that is 200 lvls below you?this is the question than many do to you and you dont answer

question to you at the same spirit manukind.what more do you get for targeting a lvl 20 or an npc?what more do you get when duel a lvl150 dead player or a lvl20?hint: it's the same answer to both
and an additional question(i know you will be too tired to answer but i will push my luck hoping this time you wil answer),since you dont gain anything extra and you cannot drag them to the torture chamber why you targed players that are 200 lvl below you?

i have answered that ad nauseum. scroll back. you just don't like my answer. i am done.
i owe you no explanations. i can hit you at any frequency for any reason.
you continue to complain. why? what rule is broken? what harm is caused?

it not that noone like your answer manuikind.your answer doesnt match on what you say like "i dont target or hit low players",i dont use my subplasma" etc
so when you make question better be ready to answer question done to you.
by the way your question have been answered by many,you on the other hand never gave a true or logic answer to the question done to you by many

what rule is broken? what harm is caused?

take those out of quotations, Subzero77. they are not quotes.

let me be as explicit as possible, kids. if you wish to lodge a successful complaint, you need to justify your complaint. if you're complaining about something that breaks no rule and causes no harm, your complaint has no merit.

yuou want answers on question that have been answered to you by many players and yet you refuse to answer one simple question that was done to you by many players,manukind.

i love a good argument. this is not one.

no actual you like arguments when ppl agree with you.this is not an argument manukind.you want answers on your questions and you avoid to answer questions done to you.

an good argument for you is when everyone agree with you and you dont have to answer any questions,manukind?

you have no idea, and i've grown bored.

you want ppl to answer you and yet you still avoiding to answer them.

i didnt expect him to answer but avoid to answer.on that part i have to admit that manukind never failed.

this forum is a case study in logical fallacies.

....and we question your logic on those pointless attacks

you don't say? well, this is the first i've heard.

this is why you avoid to answer ,right? i guess you understand the meaning of argument when ppl only agree with you or only have to anser your question.

why you dont know how to read?